He might burn a philosopher because
he was heterodox; but he must accept a barbarian because he was orthodox. And
we see, even in modern times, that the same Church which is blamed for making
sages heretics is also blamed for making savages priests. Now in a much vaguer
and more evolutionary fashion, there is something of the same idea at the back
of the great American experiment; the experiment of a democracy of diverse
races which has been compared to a melting-pot. But even that metaphor implies
that the pot itself is of a certain shape and a certain substance; a pretty
solid substance. The melting-pot must not melt. The original shape was traced
on the lines of Jeffersonian democracy; and it will remain in that shape until
it becomes shapeless. America invites all men to become citizens; but it
implies the dogma that there is such a thing as citizenship. Only, so far as
its primary ideal is concerned, its exclusiveness is religious because it is
not racial. The missionary can condemn a cannibal, precisely because he cannot
condemn a Sandwich Islander. And in something of the same spirit the American. From the What I saw in America reading. [Pg
9]
The
passage explains the diversity in America due to the America government
allowing foreigners from all of the world to become citizens. If they follow
the American policies regarding immigration than they can be and American citizens.
I thought it was interesting when he stated “the dogma that there is such a thing
as citizenship.” In my opinion that’s true
because America has a lot of citizens who were not born here. In fact I wonder
do we have the most citizens here out of all the countries who weren’t originally
citizens of the country.
This country stands for freedom and
diversity. Therefore America is the perfect country for someone to move to who
want a place to call home away from home due to the mixtures of cultures this
country has historically. I chose this paragraph because I think it explains
the American culture perfectly. Which
leads me to ask what the American culture is?
Because I don’t think we no longer have one even though we stick to the American
traditions and holidays. We might just
be the melting pot due to the diversity and the mixing of cultures. The
paragraph below I think also explains the new American culture in more detail
from the Trans-National America reading.
To face the fact that our aliens
are already strong enough to take a share in the direction of their own
destiny, and that the strong cultural movements represented by the foreign
press, schools, and colonies are a challenge to our facile attempts, is not,
however, to admit the failure of Americanization. It is not to fear the failure
of democracy. It is rather to urge us to an investigation of what Americanism
may rightly mean. It is to ask ourselves whether our ideal has been broad or
narrow--whether perhaps the time has not come to assert a higher ideal than the
"melting-pot" Surely we cannot be certain of our spiritual democracy
when, claiming to melt the nations within us to a comprehension of our free and
democratic institutions, we fly into panic at the first sign of their own will
and tendency. We act as if we wanted Americanization to take place only on our
own terms, and not by the consent of the governed. All our elaborate machinery
of settlement and school and union, of social and political naturalization,
however, will move with friction just in so far as it neglects to take into
account this strong and virile insistence that America shall be what the
immigrant will have a hand in making it, and not what a ruling class,
descendant of those British stocks which were the first permanent immigrants,
decide that America shall be made. This is the condition which confronts us,
and which demands a clear and general readjustment of our attitude and our
ideal.
No comments:
Post a Comment